XGREEN

NOTE- I sued elley may and the green party after being labeled an anti semite maliciously
I believe I won but then 150 year old laws were changed to let them off
It is as we speak in an Appeal in the BC Supreme Court
———————————————————-
As I sue and fight back and because they know I recorded them the media is removing any reference to what I had posted
Here is what was at the link above before they removed every reference to me going back to 2001

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co…&ct=clnk&gl=ca

(it also may disappear)

The Surrey Leader
Green Party fends off lawsuit

By Kevin Diakiw – Surrey North Delta Leader

Published: June 18, 2010 6:00 AM
Updated: June 18, 2010 9:28 AM

A former Green Party candidate for Newton-North Delta has lost his libel action against the party for suggesting his comments could be viewed as anti-Semitic.

In 2008, the Green Party of Canada removed John Shavluk as a candidate, after an 2006 internet post attributed to him was made public.

The party sent out a release indicating “Shavluk will not be the candidate for the party in Newton-North Delta, following revelations that he made comments in 2006 on an online discussion forum that could be construed as anti-Semitic.”

Shavluk sued the Green Party and its leader Elizabeth May.

Last week, Justice Carol Ross found in favour of May and the party.

“In the result, I have concluded that statements in both the press release and the September 16, 2008 conference call interview defamed Mr. Shavluk, were not justified on the evidence before me, and were not fair comment,” Ross wrote in her finding.

“However, I have concluded that the occasion of their publication was one of qualified privilege and that there was no evidence of malice.”

She ruled that Shavluk will pick up the legal costs.

Shavluk said Monday the ruling was “a joke and a travesty.”

“I’m 53 years old and a military veteran, and I’m beside myself,” Shavluk said. “I’m looking at bankruptcy with legal fees, like they told me when this thing started.”

He became aware of additional comments made by May just after last week’s ruling, and he’s not happy.

“Obviously, if I can raise funds, I’m going to be going after her until I win,” Shavluk said.

kdiakiw@surreyleader.com

So now as an update and as I need a public record I am going to do my court stuff at this thread

I had given some of the story but I will try and recap

I hope the story of the fights will help educate others who also rise up and fight back

To fill in the blanks

Here is the judgement

http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc…10bcsc804.html

and here is the third libel of elizabeth may current pretend green leader on the day it came out

http://greenparty.ca/media-release/2…ts-case-reject

9 June 2010 – 2:58pm
OTTAWA — The Green Party of Canada today received complete vindication in a case alleging defamation brought against the party, the Green Party of Canada Fund and leader Elizabeth May personally by a one-time candidate. The potential candidate was removed by leader Elizabeth May due to comments the former candidate had made on a blog site years before involvement with the Green Party. The comments referred to the 9-11 attacks in New York City as involving “shoddily built Jewish world bank headquarters.” In removing him as a candidate, the party explained that the comments were anti-Semitic and unacceptable to the party.

The Honourable Madam Justice Ross issued her decision today finding for the Green Party and Elizabeth May. The court ruled that, while there was defamation in the use of the term anti-Semitic, it was justified under the circumstances in our favour on qualified privilege and responsible communication. The judge ruled that there was no malice and agreed that the GPC had an obligation to tell the public that it did not condone anti-Semitism.

“It was worth this long and expensive court proceeding to be able to contribute to the on-going struggle against anti-Semitism in Canada,” said Elizabeth May. “You need to stand up for what you believe in and I am proud that the Green Party held firm.”

The case, brought by a former Green Party candidate John Shavluk, was heard before the Supreme Court of British Columbia between January 4-12, 2010.

-30-

Contact Information:
Debra Eindiguer
Press Secretary
C: 613.240.8921
media@greenparty.ca

————————————————————————————

elizabeth may testified in court that no press release goes out without her approval !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

elizabeth may has fought me tooth and nail with green party members and tax payers money…trying dirty tricks and legal mumbo jumbo

So now they are trying to have me pay for the trial before my Appeal goes through….ALMOST $40 THOUSAND DOLLARS

They have padded the original bill and even have 3 grand for 8 days in a hotel and all their meals…hahhaha

I need to find a way to post this publicly and I think the file is too big for here???

here also is a story from a senior green though that sheds some light

http://www.greenpartystrategy.com/ar…lowish-victory

people dont realize she even sicked the police on me and pretended I threatened her

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43rCNlBNnGA

heres another link

http://www.treatingyourself.com/vbul…ad.php?t=42737

but I am going to put as much as I can here to have the whole story of how corrupt those against us really are and why we must all rise up and reclaim our natural born rights

I will try to post the file or be back with a link for it some where else if need be

Marco how do we get bigger files posted ??its a PDF size 3.21 mbs?

please excuse my doing this but the truth should be out there some where so that if something happens to us the story is here

thanks

__________________
hello everyone…my name is john shavluk

and I am a cannabisolic……

belief is the most powerful force in human existence -shavluk

http://me.tokbox.com/shavluk

Http://pottalk.ning.com

http://juror.ca

http://shavluk.com/

endprohibition@telus.net

“Replacement Dropbox links as the old ones dont work now I hope these do Factum http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/Shavluk2/FACTUM%20ELECTRONIC%20COPY.doc Opening http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/Shavluk2/Shavluk%20Jan%204%20Opening.doc Transcript 1 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/Shavluk2/Shavluk%20v.%20Green%20Party%20et%20al.%20Transcript%20Volume%201.doc Transcript 2 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/Shavluk2/Shavluk%20v.%20Green%20Party%20et%20al.%20Transcript%20Volume%202.doc Transcript 3 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/Shavluk2/Shavluk%20v.%20Green%20Party%20et%20al.%20Transcript%20Volume%203.doc Closing http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/Shavluk2/Jan%2012%202010%20Closing%20Submissions.doc ”

6 thoughts on “XGREEN

  1. From here

    http://reportongreens.blogspot.com/2…n-results.html

    shavluk said…
    Well I cant take all the credit…LOL

    Elizabeth Mays own ineptitude are mostly to thank

    But here is a little info for any that want to know what she was like in court even with the judgement coming out on her own birthdate and some one with the same name as the judge a life time member of the sierra club ..LOL

    hit the link it will down load
    its from drop box.com and a great tool for getting files out there

    Factum

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/COUR…NIC%20COPY.doc

    Opening

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/COUR…%20Opening.doc

    part 1

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/COUR…Volume%201.doc

    part 2

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/COUR…Volume%202.doc

    part 3

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/COUR…Volume%203.doc

    closings

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8170272/COUR…ubmissions.doc

    PS …Watch for a soon coming announcement of my SGI BC Election Candidacy AGAINST e may
    and for me to step up my voice out there as its been silent too long !!!

    It is a WAR NOW and nothing will stop me until my name is re-cleared!
    GET IT !!

    ================================================== ==

    So I am sure word will seep out and soon I am sure she will make another bogus complaint to police but this above shows people the truth and I will never rest until I clear myself as I say

    cheers

  2. FROM HOLLOW(ISH) VICTORY Link …above

    A hollow(ish) victory

    By DERMOD TRAVIS – communications consultant

    For those who follow Green blogs religiously chances are they’ve come across postings by John Shavluk whose relationship with the party leader might charitably be described as dysfunctional.

    Not surprisingly given the nature of the beast, political parties and dysfunctional relationships all too often go together like fine whine (sic) and cheese.

    It would be impossible in 700 words to detail the entire history of this two year feud so instead, for the uninitiated to the intricacies of the Shavluk affair, the Coles Notes edition.

    In 2008, Shavluk was stripped of his party candidacy over a 2006 online posting which included a phrase that he claimed did not reflect his personal opinion but simply (ed. clumsily) cited another poster in a thread.

    Fast forward to 2009 when Shavluk sued the party for defamation over comments contained in its news release announcing his removal, and hit fast forward one more time to last week when the party eked out a win in B.C. Supreme Court.

    As is all too often the case with dysfunctional relationships, someone at the party then unwisely grabbed the kerosene to douse the fire with a news release that a few might consider needlessly combative given the unique nature of the relationship between Shavluk and the party.

    Despite its bravado, the Green party didn’t receive the “complete vindication” that it claims from the Hon. Madame Justice Ross’ 31 page judgment.

    àDid the party win? Yes. Was it completely vindicated? Define completely, define vindicated. In fact, try to find a single news report that cites the party’s exuberant phrase.

    But if ever there was a chance for cooler heads to prevail in this bitter relationship, the B.C. Supreme Court decision offered it up on a silver platter.

    In a detailed ruling in what was undoubtedly a challenging case to preside over, Madame Justice Ross wrote: “I have concluded that statements in both the press release and the September 16, 2008 conference call interview defamed Mr. Shavluk, were not justified by the evidence before me, and were not fair comment.

    ” The party prevailed, however, through the defences of qualified privilege and responsible communication, the latter only available to the party as a defence thanks to a Supreme Court of Canada decision that was brought down after Shavluk had filed his action and long after the offending words had been published.

    It’s unlikely that last week’s ruling by Justice Ross could have possibly healed this relationship regardless of which way it had come down. But a stronger acknowledgment by the party that it had in 2008 hastily, and presumably without malice, defamed Mr. Shavluk might have helped lower the heat or at least earned it some begrudging respect from observers.

    Instead in a needlessly gratuitous manner, the release took a tone that could lead some readers to infer that its 2008 release was in fact an accurate portrayal of Mr. Shavluk’s beliefs and opinions.

    This was the party’s chance to acknowledge that Mr. Shavluk was, according to Justice Ross, defamed by the party’s 2008 news release, apologize for the defamation however begrudgingly and then explain the extenuating circumstances which permitted such defamation in this very specific context.

    And if you’re looking for a poster child for 20-20 hindsight, the Shavluk saga is a contender because his candidacy clearly was badly handled from the day he showed an interest in running for the party. Its aftermath points to a number of failings at every level of the organization.

    For instance, according to the ruling, one wonders why when the Shavluk story began to break that the B.C. organizer blackberried the leader and not the Director of Organizing or the campaign manager.

    This may seem a distinction of hair splitting proportions, but as the party knows well, there’s rarely an upside for the leader when he or she gets directly involved in internal party machinations, even more so during an election campaign.

    Equally, lessons from the Shavluk affair need to be seen by party apparatchiks in the context of the earlier Potvin affair when Kevin Potvin another Vancouver area candidate was forced to step aside after an editorial that he wrote regarding his reactions to 9-11 came to light.

    As the saying goes, “fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.”

    Dermod Travis is former Director of Communications for the Green Party of Canada and organized the Green Party’s 2006 National Convention

    * Please refer to ‘related content’ (side-box Right) for Justice Ross’ decision

    Comments
    Thank You Dermod
    Mon, 06/14/2010 – 10:00 — Anonymous
    Yes thank you!

    Here is the press release

    9 June 2010 – 3:58pm
    OTTAWA — The Green Party of Canada today received complete vindication in a case alleging defamation brought against the party, the Green Party of Canada Fund and leader Elizabeth May personally by a one-time candidate. The potential candidate was removed by leader Elizabeth May due to comments the former candidate had made on a blog site years before involvement with the Green Party. The comments referred to the 9-11 attacks in New York City as involving “shoddily built Jewish world bank headquarters.” In removing him as a candidate, the party explained that the comments were anti-Semitic and unacceptable to the party.

    The Honourable Madam Justice Ross issued her decision today finding for the Green Party and Elizabeth May. The court ruled that, while there was defamation in the use of the term anti-Semitic, it was justified under the circumstances in our favour on qualified privilege and responsible communication. The judge ruled that there was no malice and agreed that the GPC had an obligation to tell the public that it did not condone anti-Semitism.

    “It was worth this long and expensive court proceeding to be able to contribute to the on-going struggle against anti-Semitism in Canada,” said Elizabeth May. “You need to stand up for what you believe in and I am proud that the Green Party held firm.”

    The case, brought by a former Green Party candidate John Shavluk, was heard before the Supreme Court of British Columbia between January 4-12, 2010.

    -30-

    Contact Information:
    Debra Eindiguer
    Press Secretary
    C: 613.240.8921
    media@greenparty.ca

    Thanks E May as it doesn’t sound like you will stop libeling me even with a very very lucky court verdict.

    “”The struggle against anti semitism”"” ? Really? Wow !

    I as a 53 year old Military veteran and grandfather now sit here contemplating just leaving this country …very broken ….soon bankrupted and also ruined again for a second time in twenty years ….I do want to thank you for your honesty here.
    Honesty was something I thought the greens had as I left my positions in the ndp just for the lack of it.

    I find now that although I used every dollar of credit I could find of my own and also my wifes just to try to clear my previously good name and did it all myself for the very same reasons that 150 year old laws can come tumbling down and wreck lives and save malicious hurtful people.

    The fact remains to me that this really had zero to do with anti semitism as the party already cleared me of that quote 18 months before they re-used it sept 4 2008.
    I have been fighting since 1991 for justice because of my own framing for 8 grams of cannabis only because I stood up for the down trodden in Saskatoon and again obviously needed to be silenced.

    It has been a very long journey.
    One that has destroyed my belief systems to the core and even those of ordinary people.

    There is no such thing as justice…only a thing called “the privileged”.

    I did all I could to avert the battle and still kept busy trying to grow the party all through it.

    I give up.
    I quit.
    I can not raise the twenty thousand dollars I would need to try to beat back this terrible decision of the courts as they fabricate reasons for it with bogus materials or ignore proof and believe lies on the stand.

    E May provided zero proof but is someone and I obviously am not.

    You win green party.
    Thanks to you I am not even able to function.
    I hope the truth does come out one day and I hope and pray for karma to reward all those who feel it is ok to just destroy anyone over internal bumbling by their own organizations.

    I now await the bankrupting bill and the debts I already incurred fighting for my previously good family name.

    Anything shavluk is my family as the name doesn’t exist outside of it.

    I am ashamed of Canada and the green party.

    But I thank you Sir Mr Dermod Travis!!

    Cheers

    “Struggle against anti-semitism”? Really?
    Mon, 06/14/2010 – 13:33 — Anonymous
    In the media release Elizabeth May is quoted as havnig said that “It was worth this long and expensive court proceeding to be able to contribute to the on-going struggle against anti-Semitism in Canada,” said Elizabeth May. “You need to stand up for what you believe in and I am proud that the Green Party held firm.”

    The Green Party and May did not raise the defence of truth in the case and therefore did not prove that Shavluk is in fact anti-Semitic. Further, the court did not accept the party’s and May’s defence that it was fair comment to call Shavluk anti-Semitic or to imply that he is.

    If Shavluk is not anti-Semitic, then, can someone explain how defending against Shavluk’s law suit in any way contributed to the “struggle against anti-Semitism in Canada”?

    Markus Buchart
    Winnipeg, Manitoba
    (Not a Green Party member)

    A hollow(ish) victory
    Thu, 06/17/2010 – 14:07 — Anonymous
    I have removed the other video temporarily and will repost it soon
    just search “green libel”

    This one is the Surrey Leader Newspaper

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCz53nt-hgc

    I am saddened that no one it seems outside of just us few even care about the green party

Leave a Reply